Teams

Three Body

2023 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-27vs Miletti-CadyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJ Nathan / Richard Wang vs Daniel Park / Thomas Berray1-6, 3-6
2023-06-22vs Full SpeedWon 10
W#2 DoublesChangfu Xiao / Yiran Liu vs Byron Levy / Michael Mahaney7-6, 6-0
2023-06-09vs TerminettersWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Wang / Changfu Xiao vs Duane Wright / Florian Kogelnik6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-25vs Team LieberSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHung Nguyen / Changfu Xiao vs Cosby Hunt / John Olson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / J Nathan vs Paul Levine / Kevin Wu1-6, 6-7
2023-05-21vs Miletti-CadyLost 01
L#1 DoublesYiran Liu / Changfu Xiao vs Scott Washow / Christopher Cosca6-7, 4-6
2023-05-15vs Full SpeedLost 01
L#2 DoublesJ Nathan / Tzuhsiu Chiou vs Maurice Amsellem / Chris Ryan5-7, 4-6
2023-05-09vs Rising Tide 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChangfu Xiao / Phat Bui vs Stephen Dessel / Rohan Bhale6-2, 6-2
2023-04-25vs TerminettersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / J Nathan vs Christopher Apo / Kashif Haque6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHong Hu / Changfu Xiao vs Manish Shah / Florian Kogelnik6-2, 6-4
2023-04-13vs Team LieberLost 01
L#1 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / J Nathan vs Alfredo Perez / Jonathan Santos4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Changfu Xiao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Phat Bui
published
4.12
Hong Hu
published
4.12
Yue She
published
3.93
Kevin Yang
published
3.93
Xiaofei Zhu
published
3.79
J Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.78
Harry Hu
published
3.54
Paul Brennan
published
Hung Nguyen
published
Richard Wang
published
Sinan Kalayoglu
published
Yiran Liu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Changfu Xiao
109W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Phat Bui
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Hong Hu
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
Yue She
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Kevin Yang
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.93
Xiaofei Zhu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.93
4
J Nathan
124W–108L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Harry Hu
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
Hung Nguyen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Wang
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sinan Kalayoglu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yiran Liu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.