Teams

La.Brock40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-06vs Is.Pataki40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesW Troutman vs Joe Rodriguez6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Matthew Richman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAndrew Tate vs Geoff Knight7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Is.Pataki40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesEnric Prat Codina vs Matthew Richman0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-17vs Ga.Jimenez40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesLawrence Brock vs Ted Lotchin6-1, 6-0
2026-07-15vs Da.Breazeale40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesGraham Schillmoller vs Daniel Breazeale6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLawrence Brock vs Robert Whitehurst6-3, 6-3
2026-06-24vs Da.Breazeale40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesEnric Prat Codina vs Jason Grunberg6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesGraham Schillmoller vs Robert Whitehurst6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLawrence Brock vs Will Johnson4-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs Ga.Jimenez40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesGraham Schillmoller vs Charles Gowland6-1, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Is.Pataki40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Matthew Richman6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEnric Prat Codina vs Sam Osman6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-03vs Da.Breazeale40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesW Troutman vs Will Johnson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLawrence Brock vs J Barnes Stephenson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Brock40S8123412165
2Is.Pataki40S54131432234
3Da.Breazeale40S45131431241
4Ga.Jimenez40S1852246287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jeff Cockayne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.91
W Troutman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.90
Graham Schillmoller
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Tate
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Enric Prat Codina
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Brock + Graham Schillmoller472159% games+2.3% vs expected
W Troutman + Lawrence Brock22659% games+0.4% vs expected
W Troutman + Graham Schillmoller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Cockayne
156W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
W Troutman
356W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Graham Schillmoller
170W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Andrew Tate
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Enric Prat Codina
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.