Teams

CStaton (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs JGardiner (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDora Burdzinska-Drezek / CJ Rummelsburg vs Jennifer Gardiner / Kristin Davin2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackie Gaine / Beverly Harrell vs Eryn Ratcliffe / Suzy Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-26vs STo (OPRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJackie Gaine / Ivey Westerkam vs Sandra To / Michelle Ziewacz6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Richards / Elizabeth Krogstie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-19vs ATaylor (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesChristine Richards / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Betsy Hartman / Sheila Walsh6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDora Burdzinska-Drezek / CJ Rummelsburg vs Julia Wilson / Sophie Pollak6-3, 6-1
2023-09-12vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesChristine Richards / Angela Stallman vs Debbie Titlestad / Elizabeth Strack6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJackie Gaine / Beverly Harrell vs Lizzy Ervin / Mindy Merchant6-0, 6-2
2023-09-05vs THolwager (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLina Clarke / Angela Stallman vs Elena Donaldson / Christina Peterson6-3, 7-6
2023-08-22vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLina Clarke / Angela Stallman vs Jordan Bowers / Megan Hunter5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana West / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Jessica Varn / Sandy Mullis6-3, 6-4
2023-08-15vs JBlack/MParker (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIvey Westerkam / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek vs Amanda Patrocino / Meredith Sweeney3-6, 1-6
2023-08-08vs XThreet/AHitchins (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSanjana Sudhir / Angela Stallman vs Sara Thompson / Michele Sutherland6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jackie Gaine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Lina Clarke
published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
CJ Rummelsburg
published 4.5
4.09
Christine Richards
published 4.5
4.01
Irma Laney
published
3.80
Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Janna Huggins
published 4
3.76
Angela Stallman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
C E Swanson
published 4
3.67
Elizabeth Krogstie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Cynthia Staton
published 4
3.39
Beverly Harrell
published 3.5
Sanjana Sudhir
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Stallman + Jackie Gaine8365% gamesnot enough data
Diana West + Jackie Gaine213 matchesnot enough data
Angela Stallman + Janna Huggins213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Krogstie + Jackie Gaine213 matchesnot enough data
Irma Laney + Dora Burdzinska-Drezek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jackie Gaine
91W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Lina Clarke
66W–47L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
CJ Rummelsburg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christine Richards
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
4.09
Irma Laney
28W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
50W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Janna Huggins
63W–61L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Angela Stallman
93W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
C E Swanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Krogstie
263W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Cynthia Staton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Beverly Harrell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
Sanjana Sudhir
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.