Teams

SFV - CNR

2024 Mixed 18+ SFV Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 9.0 MxD

16 players · average NTRP 4.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesLauren DiFazio / Hirsch Matani vs Jordan Hickey / Eugene Tran5-7, 4-6
2024-02-25vs SFV - AV StormersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren DiFazio / Ryan Williams vs Leticia Alcala / Carlos Guarin4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-18vs SFV - AV StormersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Marley / Lauren DiFazio vs Miranda Prescott / Alan Esguerra7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHirsch Matani / Lauren DiFazio vs Anthony Lim / Emily Werman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndre Law / April Hartstein vs Jason Gorman / Erica Smalley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 9.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.67
4.57
4.53
Lauren DiFazio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.39
Chandler Nguyen
published 4.5
4.29
April Hartstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andre Law
published 4.5
4.22
Felicity Flesher
published
4.21
Michael Marley
published
4.19
Nicolas Stansbury
published
4.12
Shanna Reznik
published
3.86
Kelly Kenney
published
Hirsch Matani
published
Julie Juliani
published
Katie Doran
published
Tosten Burks
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
131W–67L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.71
Jessica Widmark Hillman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Christopher Kenney
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
Lauren DiFazio
122W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.53
4.5
Chandler Nguyen
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Andre Law
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Felicity Flesher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Michael Marley
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Nicolas Stansbury
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
4.19
Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Kelly Kenney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.86
Hirsch Matani
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Doran
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tosten Burks
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.