Teams

RID CODY

2026 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-13vs RTC DURBORAWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracey Wood-Sanford / Jennifer Rutter vs Maura Jackson / Charissa Kumar3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Selking / Shannon Mulroy vs Dee Dee Stewart / Katrina Wagner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-06vs RID HYDESplit 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Mulroy / Maria Isabel Pena-Keller vs Melinda Delk / Haley McCarthy5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelli Lindemann vs Lani Payne Sandu2-6, 0-6
2026-01-16vs RID HYDELost 12
W#1 DoublesMEREDITH CODY / Maria Isabel Pena-Keller vs Danielle Dollahite / Megan Quirk6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLauren Selking vs Callie Torda3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIvy Ellis / Cathie Leslie vs Lauren Hyde / Haley McCarthy6-7, 4-6
2026-01-09vs STC ALLENWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracey Wood-Sanford / Jennifer Rutter vs Pam Allen / Carter Purcell6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMEREDITH CODY vs Sara Clarke3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Selking / Shannon Mulroy vs Brandy Oetman / Petra Heagy6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · A
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RID CODY31751290
2STC ALLEN2163767
3RID HYDE237817141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Maria Isabel Pena-Keller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tracey Wood-Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
MEREDITH CODY
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Shannon Mulroy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Kelli Lindemann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Sarah Peterson
published
2.80
Lauren Selking
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Cathie Leslie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Ivy Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Selking + MEREDITH CODY9257% games+16.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Isabel Pena-Keller
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Tracey Wood-Sanford
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
MEREDITH CODY
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Shannon Mulroy
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kelli Lindemann
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sarah Peterson
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Lauren Selking
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Cathie Leslie
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ivy Ellis
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.