Teams

Double Trouble

2022 Prince Georges Mixed 18 & Over · Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-27vs 6.0 Mixed LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesKyle Spinks / Venita Cooper vs Martha Givan / Jason Lee6-2, 6-2
2022-03-20vs Guys & DollsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKudzai Mukushi / Sheila O'Connell vs Steven Gibau / Diana Williams Gibau6-2, 6-2
2022-03-12vs Lob StarsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKyle Spinks / Ilona Teleki vs Jacinda Johnson / Timothy Murphy5-7, 2-6
2022-02-05vs Lob StarsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Hood / Andras Teleki vs Mindy Blakney / Franklin Sorto2-6, 0-6
2022-01-29vs 6.0 Mixed LoVVWon 10
W#2 DoublesKudzai Mukushi / Julia Cusick vs Jason Lee / Martha Givan7-5, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Struther van Horn
published
3.34
Sheila O'Connell
published
3.32
Andras Teleki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Tim McNamara
published
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.03
Kyle Spinks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Julia Cusick
published
2.75
Kudzai Mukushi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gabrielle Sims
published 3
Ilona Teleki
published 3
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
Leonel Robles
published
Nate Eagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Surmiller + Tim McNamara224 matchesnot enough data
Ilona Teleki + Andras Teleki303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Struther van Horn
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Sheila O'Connell
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Andras Teleki
47W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Tim McNamara
94W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.27
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Kyle Spinks
98W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
Julia Cusick
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Kudzai Mukushi
44W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gabrielle Sims
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ilona Teleki
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Venita Cooper
20W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Leonel Robles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nate Eagle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.