Teams

OC CMTC - Konnie - Sat1

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-25vs OC Anaheim TC - Linda/JosieWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Woodside / Julie Morin vs Helen Garner / Jacquetta Perkins1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGemma Snell / Julie Heck vs Josephine Chow / Yoko Ohigashi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaribeth F Rodriguez / Lisabeth Grimm vs Linda Kronseder / Caprina Auyong6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJulie Morin / Trang Phan vs Ellen Aistars / Kelley McBride6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Heck / Doris Branscombe vs Lisa Rutherford / Shelly Carroll4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGemma Snell / Khanh Vu vs Pam Schuler / Suzanne Weinstock2-6, 5-7
2026-07-12vs OC MetaServe LPC - Debra - Sat11Won 21
W#1 DoublesTrang Phan / Julie Morin vs Jing Dong / Isabelle Krenz6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKhanh Vu / Lisabeth Grimm vs Kaeko Jenni / Betty Shiihara6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYsa Le / Julie Heck vs Xuan Le / Susie Xie1-6, 3-6
2026-07-11vs OC LNRC - Joan - Sat10Won 30
W#1 DoublesTrang Phan / Julie Morin vs Christine Andriola / Maureen Dominguez6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Woodside / Lisabeth Grimm vs Andrea Mcginley / Dina Kagawa6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Heck / Ysa Le vs Kim Parker / Joan Levis7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKhanh Vu / Lisa Woodside vs Leona Tohill / Christine Bullette1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTrang Phan / Gemma Snell vs Sheri Hall / Diana Hirst6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDoris Branscombe / Elizabeth Sanders vs Gilda Banta / Margaret Drugan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLisa Woodside / Gemma Snell vs Elaiza Capan / Debra Sampson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoris Branscombe / Ysa Le vs Amy Ching / Allegra Fulcher5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Briones / Maribeth F Rodriguez vs Cheryl Gifford / Joyce Westerdahl6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTrang Phan / Lisa Woodside vs Sharon Diekneit / Mary Goff6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKhanh Vu / Julie Heck vs Gloria Medina / Kim Webster2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Briones / Maribeth F Rodriguez vs Leslie Flower / Vicki Mingus3-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs OC CMTC - Tricia - Sun11Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTrang Phan / Julie Heck vs Tricia Bregman / Dee Harriman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Khanh Vu vs Christina Case / Sandra Patel4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisabeth Grimm / Lisa Woodside vs Cindy Carpenter / Cathy Jackson4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · OC Women WE - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Acing Gracefully Los Cab - Susan - Sat 118018619203
2OC Forty Love - LPC Diekneit - Sun116215921181
3OC CMTC - Tricia - Sun115317720186
4OC Irvine Heritage Park - Kelley - Sun1153141026220
5OC RCI Weekend Warrior Women - Cheryl - Sun123053131129228
6OC CMTC - Konnie - Sat135111330223
7OC MetaServe LPC - Debra - Sat112681633208
8OC LNRC - Joan - Sat101771736256
9OC Anaheim TC - Linda/Josie1751939257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Robin Briones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.35
Tracy Hurd
published
3.23
Lisabeth Grimm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Lisa Woodside
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.16
Khanh Vu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Doris Branscombe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Julie Heck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Gemma Snell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Morin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Trang Phan
published
Ysa Le
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robin Briones
111W–135L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tracy Hurd
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Lisabeth Grimm
63W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Lisa Woodside
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Khanh Vu
17W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Doris Branscombe
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Julie Heck
16W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gemma Snell
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Julie Morin
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trang Phan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ysa Le
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.