Teams

HCC Williams / Caldwell

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs Stonehenge GoodreauWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Caldwell / Dodi Allocca vs Jeannette Reiter / Michele Smith2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-06-17vs ACAC CarmanLost 02
L#1 SinglesJane Kauder vs Julie Ruth7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristy Bauer / ANJA BAUGH vs Leigh Gorman / Elizabeth Kimball1-6, 2-6
2021-06-15vs Burkwood BrowningLost 02
L#1 SinglesAynsley Fisher vs Lindsey O'Kane3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Law / Kristy Bauer vs Robin Booth / Nancy Row1-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs Salisbury HartmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Law / Sally Caldwell vs Anne Maliff / Kristin Kim6-1, 6-4
2021-06-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Caldwell / Janine Hoffer vs Michelle Baker / Leslie Lamers2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-25vs CCV Loving / ReifsniderWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristy Bauer / Virginia Berents vs Kathy Bor / Laurel Wise0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAynsley Fisher vs Laura West Hatcher7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Kauder / Cheryl Law vs Kate Beckler / Robin Reifsnider6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kristy Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Aynsley Fisher
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Sally Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Addie Miller
published 4
3.62
Jane Kauder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Janine Hoffer
published
3.31
ANJA BAUGH
published 3.5
3.26
Virginia Berents
published
3.22
Kathy Harcum
published
3.10
Cheryl Law
published 3.5
Jennifer Polk
published
Judi Baker
published
Lynn Holly
published
Pamela Grady
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Kauder + Sally Caldwell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristy Bauer
57W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Aynsley Fisher
108W–109L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Sally Caldwell
42W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Addie Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Jane Kauder
49W–37L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Janine Hoffer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
ANJA BAUGH
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Virginia Berents
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Kathy Harcum
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cheryl Law
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Polk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Judi Baker
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lynn Holly
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Grady
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.