Teams

LATA18/Vazquez/LCTC

2025 SC Singles 18 & Over - SC · Adult Men - 3.0

6 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-20vs LATA18/DAY/SSPLost 12
W#1 SinglesKevin Crossland vs Jimmy Marrello6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJeff Klaseus vs Sivakumar Shanmugam3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesGrayson Vazquez vs Derek Clark4-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs LATA18/Boland/CAMPWon 30
W#1 SinglesReeves Harvey vs Brian Harris6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKevin Crossland vs David Bowen6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesZach Santiago vs Bobby Leonard6-2, 7-5
2025-08-30Lost 03
L#1 SinglesReeves Harvey vs Jon Davis2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesZach Santiago vs David Bowen2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJeff Klaseus vs Robert Boland4-6, 0-6
2025-08-23vs LATA18/DAY/SSPWon 21
W#1 SinglesKevin Crossland vs Jackson Doudoukjian6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGabriel Moura vs Derek Clark6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJeff Klaseus vs Heath Rollins1-6, 0-6
2025-08-16vs LATA18/Boland/CAMPLost 12
W#1 SinglesGabriel Moura vs David Bowen6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesGrayson Vazquez vs Filipe Cupertino3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesReeves Harvey vs Jon Davis2-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs LATA18/DAY/SSPLost 12
W#1 SinglesKevin Crossland vs Shaun Day6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGrayson Vazquez vs Daniel Rudzinski5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesZach Santiago vs Sivakumar Shanmugam0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Gabriel Moura
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.97
Kevin Crossland
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Reeves Harvey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.66
Jeff Klaseus
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Zach Santiago
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.60
Grayson Vazquez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Santiago + Reeves Harvey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriel Moura
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Kevin Crossland
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Reeves Harvey
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Jeff Klaseus
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Zach Santiago
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Grayson Vazquez
15W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.