Teams

Miller - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-16vs Crooke - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Zack Gonzalez vs Jami Steinmetz / Robert Steinmetz7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen McCrory / Leigh Clark vs Douglass Kreis / Whitney Calametti5-7, 3-6
2021-08-08vs Stewart - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Brown / Arlene Doyle vs Stephen Baes / Jennifer Passeretti6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-07-26vs Wroten - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJosh Koivu / Arlene Doyle vs Gordon Paulus / Terrie Racine6-2, 6-1
2021-07-21vs Marino - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarl Miller / Leigh Clark vs Ronnie Fuller / Dawn Marino5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen McCrory / Arlene Doyle vs Shane Russell / Carly Russell6-4, 6-4
2021-07-05vs Crooke - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Brown / Tami McGhee vs Claudia Simmons / John Simmons6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Zack Gonzalez vs Blair Crooke / Shaner Garner Crooke2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.34
Carel Demanss
published 4.5
4.06
Arlene Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Tami McGhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Jason Struck
published
3.83
Erin Rhone
published 4
3.57
Zack Gonzalez
published
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
published 3.5
3.18
Michael Ghiorso
published
Leigh Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Carel Demanss
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
4.34
4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Tami McGhee
101W–56L career · 1 line in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
Jason Struck
9W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Christopher Brown
11W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Erin Rhone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zack Gonzalez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
Michael Ghiorso
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Leigh Clark
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.