Teams

IE-LLW-TCC-Foran

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#3 DoublesMark Yarter / John McGaha vs Darrell Millsap / Wayne West6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStuart Yang / John McGaha vs Christopher Enciso / Darrell Millsap6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRyan Foran / Chad Brantley vs Bambang Tamsur / Thomas Lanz6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRichard Eddy / Andrew Ghazarian vs Donovan Dang / Luis Rodriguez6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Yarter / Kyle Wilson vs Gustavo Olmos / Ehab Ateia6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Shawn ONeill
published
4.06
Ryan Foran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
James Fidak
published
3.92
Chad Brantley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Andrew Ghazarian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Richard Eddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Amar Raheja
published 4
3.71
Mark Yarter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Rory Leisinger
published
3.67
John McGaha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Dennis Ho
published 3.5
3.57
Stuart Yang
published
Thomas Bird
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Eddy + Ryan Foran8168% games+5.1% vs expected
Richard Eddy + Andrew Ghazarian213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn ONeill
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.36
Ryan Foran
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
James Fidak
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Chad Brantley
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Andrew Ghazarian
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Richard Eddy
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Amar Raheja
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Armen Mardirossian
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Yarter
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Rory Leisinger
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
John McGaha
54W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Dennis Ho
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Stuart Yang
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Thomas Bird
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.