Teams

Point Set, Burgess

2023 18&Over Mixed · 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-18vs Point Set, Schnabel/ThomasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Burgess / Kimberly Gershon vs Ian Zaslansky / Deirdre Ettus2-6, 1-1
2023-02-04vs Carefree, CassidySplit 11
W#2 DoublesDaniel Burgess / Susan Greenberg vs Cristina Leek / Keith Lopez6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMonika Weinstein / Raphael Wilson vs Cristina Bryan / Jack Chen5-7, 3-6
2023-01-21vs Deer Park, Chua/LaibleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDaniel Burgess / Susan Greenberg vs Glen Eschbach / Sonmi Wong2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRaphael Wilson / Monika Weinstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Poulos / Courtney Burek vs Dillon McKenzie / Mehves Kocak-Elci3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Poulos / Courtney Burek vs Amani Siddiqui / Anastasya Menshikova2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-22vs Point Set, Schnabel/ThomasWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Poulos / Courtney Burek vs Paul Schnabel / Nancy Turnblacer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Peter Poulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.23
Brittney Eady
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Kimberly Gershon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Caira Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Shin Kang
published
3.34
Susan Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Kevin Burgess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Monika Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Weiss
published
Raphael Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Yen So
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Burgess + Susan Greenberg3445% games−2.5% vs expected
Monika Weinstein + Kevin Burgess2346% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Burgess + Monika Weinstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Poulos
49W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Daniel Burgess
22W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brittney Eady
117W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Kimberly Gershon
98W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Caira Walker
25W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shin Kang
40W–31L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
4
Susan Greenberg
106W–97L career · 12 lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
Kevin Burgess
28W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Monika Weinstein
35W–46L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Weiss
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Raphael Wilson
113W–67L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yen So
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.