Teams

SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl Canyon/SA9

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Julia Campbell / Theona Zhordania7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-12-10vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SA8Won 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Roman-Gonzalez / Amy Hasquet vs Mary Chau / Krislea Manuva4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen McDowell / Veronica Saucedo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Marilyn Olson / Trish Newlin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Amy Hasquet vs Sheila Purdy / Margery Ruffalo6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-12vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Suzanne Segal vs Lauren Nicole Finke / Khin Aye3-6, 2-6
2022-11-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Rebecca Roman-Gonzalez vs Lynette Nicolo Grecia / Eva Agustin6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Kathleen McDowell vs Lisa Lerg / Sabrina Wedge6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Christyne Burdett / Alison Latiolait2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Jacquelin Hoppenjans vs Aram Hamidi / Amy Newhall0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Roman-Gonzalez / Amy Hasquet vs Teri McClure / Jerri Johnson7-6, 6-2
2022-10-01vs SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/ SU8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElyse Gainor / Jacquelin Hoppenjans vs Franciz Bragg / Cara Hofstad6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Carrie Gan vs Tess de Los Reyes / Danielle Perrigue3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Ricki Rogow vs Penapa Frick / Kristin McQueen1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Regina Cheung / Rebecca Stokes6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Jacquelin Hoppenjans vs Linda Brandley / Shelley McMahon6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie Gan
published 4.5
3.84
3.80
Rebecca Escandon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Elyse Gainor
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Veronica Saucedo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carrie Gan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Charanya Sivaraman
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Rebecca Escandon
158W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Elyse Gainor
46W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Veronica Saucedo
145W–113L career · 1 line in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.