Teams

Cox/Rigby

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Combined

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-04vs RusickWon 20
W#1 DoublesBadr Meskine / Wendy Yang vs Harrison Bohn / Teah Flynn6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarianne Sokup / Bo Jin vs Ilona Clyne / Christopher Mendola6-4, 6-3
2021-07-28vs WheelandWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pisarkiewicz / Bryan Rigby vs Connie Weiss / Carl Weiss3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWendi Creely / William Hamilton vs Erica Sipes / Sam Shouldis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlison Cox / Clayton Matthews vs Martina Augsburger / Charles Welton6-4, 6-5
2021-07-14vs STL-Waters/18&Over8.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBohan Li / Jennifer Smith vs Megan Niemeyer / Paul Gontarz6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Cox / Clayton Matthews vs Miranda Lopez / Peter Gontarz5-7, 5-7
2021-06-28vs LahmWon 30
W#1 DoublesBohan Li / Jennifer Smith vs Zacharias Barringer / Mary Pat Geldmeier6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBadr Meskine / Jennifer Pisarkiewicz vs Jim Enright / Grace Chi6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlison Cox / Clayton Matthews vs Colleen Corbett / Dwayne Upson6-1, 6-2
2021-06-23vs SindecuseWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarianne Sokup / William Hamilton vs Annie Walsh / John Schaefer5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pisarkiewicz / Bryan Rigby vs Sarah Wedick / Joseph Hawkes6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Bohan Li vs Tracey Tebbe / Nick Jury6-2, 6-2
2021-06-16vs Rusick Folgers BlendLost 12
L#1 DoublesBo Jin / Alison Cox vs Julie Ray / Kevin Ray3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Rigby / Jennifer Smith vs K Feldman / John Schless3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBadr Meskine / Jennifer Pisarkiewicz vs Anne Muren / William Dannevik7-6, 6-3
2021-06-02vs Hannigan/FrySplit 11
W#1 DoublesBohan Li / Marianne Sokup vs Patricia Fry / Timothy Kunkel7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Yang / William Hamilton vs Kyle Jobe / Becky Hall3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-26vs Herder Amazing Lou FuseWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarianne Sokup / Bohan Li vs Kelly Lauman / David Geddam6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Yang / William Hamilton vs Kathy Arnold / Jeff Doerge6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWendi Creely / Badr Meskine vs Shelley Fridley / Dairus Williams6-0, 6-4
2021-05-19vs Myers Mach 1Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pisarkiewicz / Bohan Li vs Sydney Attebery / George Hendrix6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendi Creely / Badr Meskine vs Christina Pupillo / Dana Best6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Cox / Clayton Matthews vs Ita Pumphrey / Jeremy Greenlee6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL-Waters/18&Over8.0MXD9122821224
2Cox/Rigby6318919192
3Hannigan/Fry63171027210
4Herder Amazing Lou Fuse63131431257
5Sindecuse54161125234
6Lahm45121536272
7Myers Mach 146121839280
8Wheeland36151228241
9Rusick Folgers Blend2772042285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison Cox
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Badr Meskine
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
William Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.88
Marianne Sokup
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Bohan Li
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Clayton Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Wendy Yang
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.66
Bryan Rigby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Wendi Creely
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Bo Jin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Cox + Clayton Matthews314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alison Cox
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Badr Meskine
61W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
William Hamilton
69W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.10
Marianne Sokup
59W–107L career · 4 lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
3.88
4
Bohan Li
32W–13L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Clayton Matthews
62W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Yang
114W–94L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Bryan Rigby
68W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Wendi Creely
119W–82L career · 3 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bo Jin
36W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jennifer Pisarkiewicz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.