Teams

GOLDMAN TC 65AM8.0A

2024 ADULT 65&Over · Men 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Anthony Giles
published 4
Bert Jensen
published 4
3.65
Brian Roberge
published 4
3.65
Chris Oconnor
published 4
3.61
Charles Spelman
published 4
3.51
Gregg Trueman
published
3.40
Rocky Moss
published
Ed Der
published
Jim Thorne
published
John McCracken
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Giles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Bert Jensen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brian Roberge
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Chris Oconnor
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Charles Spelman
3W–16L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Gregg Trueman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Rocky Moss
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.40
Ed Der
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Thorne
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John McCracken
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.