Teams

FK - Copeland

2023 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-11vs GO - HollnagelWon 10
W#2 DoublesLucy Kaul / Ellen Perrone vs Lauren Stevenson / Cheryl Prusak7-6, 6-2
2023-12-02vs MARION/Millsaps/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarisa Rodriguez / Irina Madorsky vs Carmen Rosario / Cara Owens5-7, 1-6
2023-11-18vs FK - LongSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLucy Kaul / Ellen Perrone vs Pamela Rice / Oksana Velis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarisa Rodriguez / Irina Madorsky vs Patricia Tremblay / Kim Arcobello6-0, 6-4
2023-11-11vs MARION/Millsaps/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesGwen Ehler / Cheryl Mulhern vs Nicole Millsaps / Abigail Dellovade1-6, 1-6
2023-11-06vs GO - HollnagelWon 10
W#3 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Marisa Rodriguez vs Nicole Jones / Lauren Stevenson6-2, 6-1
2023-10-14vs GO - HollnagelWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Perrone / Carmel Knight - * vs Amy Musikantow / Chrissy Hollnagel6-1, 6-1
2023-10-06vs MARION/Millsaps/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarisa Rodriguez / Irina Madorsky vs Abigail Dellovade / Sharon Christie Ybanez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGwen Ehler / Jody Nielsen vs Taryn Schacter / Carmen Rosario0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Irina Madorsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Lucy Kaul
published
Hera Peterson
published 3.5
3.13
Ellen Perrone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Gwen Ehler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Marisa Rodriguez
published
2.70
Jholie Lawrence
published
2.66
Nancy Binko
published
Jane Kaul
published
Jody Nielsen
published
Michelle Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irina Madorsky
222W–180L career · 4 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Hera Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ellen Perrone
88W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gwen Ehler
67W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jholie Lawrence
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Nancy Binko
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.66
Jane Kaul
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jody Nielsen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Smith
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.