Teams

MARIN TC CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Dana Marotto
published 4.5
4.38
Jennifer Mills
published
4.33
Jennifer Doucette
published
4.27
Robin Gluck
published
4.26
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
published
4.23
4.16
Nicole Buckland
published
4.13
Brooke Juhl
published 4.5
3.98
Merilee Bordin
published
3.96
Lisa Trusheim
published
3.94
Amy See
published 4.5
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
published
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
published 4
3.65
Elaine Kitano
published
3.63
Kris Hinckley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Martina Hamamjian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Susan Swezy
published
3.56
Tina Skouras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Emily Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kerri Chase
published
3.35
Germana Fabbri
published
Dominika Halka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Ogdie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merilee Bordin + Martina Hamamjian5453% games−2.0% vs expected
Merilee Bordin + Kris Hinckley3263% gamesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Eastlack + Emily Bell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Marotto
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
Jennifer Doucette
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
4.33
Robin Gluck
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Christine Costamagna
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Nicole Buckland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Brooke Juhl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Merilee Bordin
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Lisa Trusheim
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
Lisa Eastlack
39W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Elaine Kitano
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Kris Hinckley
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Martina Hamamjian
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Emily Bell
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Kerri Chase
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Germana Fabbri
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Dominika Halka
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Ogdie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.