Teams

Yadkin/De Young/18 6.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 6.5 - Tuesday Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-07vs Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Eugenia Gallo / Colleen Isaacson vs Katie Thompson / Katelyn Chapman6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHannah Giles / Emily Mustin vs Kim Haynes / Deirdre Hjelt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMeghan de Young / Jennifer Baker vs JoAnn White / Kristie Moesner6-0, 6-1
2025-09-30vs Yadkin/Griggs/18+6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Callie Kaszycki vs Amy Mills / Donna Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeghan de Young / Jennifer Maguire vs Felice Manget Harvey / Chanel Griggs6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Hylarides / Amy Braden vs Chenequa Ceasar / Torin Liberthson-Brown7-6, 6-0
2025-09-23vs Yadkin/Keller/Westwood/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Eugenia Gallo / Colleen Isaacson vs Virginia Pleasants / Laura Gregory6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Varsik / Callie Kaszycki vs Jennifer Keller / McKenzie Edwards6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Jennifer Maguire vs Valerie Berger / Carrie Haberkost6-3, 7-6
2025-09-14vs Yadkin/Allen-Ray/Old Town/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Varsik / Emily Mustin vs Adele Roberts / Mary Grantham6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDanielle Wright / Betsy Harris vs Jessica Best / Claire Devon6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Amy Braden vs Betsey Hutton / Whitney Newell6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-09vs Yadkin/Allen-Ray/Old Town/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Eugenia Gallo / Jennifer Baker vs Jennifer Bryan / Claire Devon4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Wright / Jennifer Maguire vs Becca Breeden / Lela Ray6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHannah Giles / Amy Braden vs Caroline Shamburg / Jennie Smith6-1, 6-4
2025-09-02vs Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHannah Giles / Emily Mustin vs Clarissa Tatum / Deirdre Hjelt6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Colleen Isaacson vs Katie Thompson / Katelyn Chapman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Harris / Lauren Hylarides vs JoAnn White / Kabler Meyer6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Yadkin/Griggs/18+6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesHannah Giles / Colleen Isaacson vs Felice Manget Harvey / Kelly Dugan6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Hartsough / Jennifer Baker vs Donna Johnson / Amanda Crews6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Hylarides / Amy Braden vs Amy Mills / Torin Liberthson-Brown6-0, 6-2
2025-08-19vs Yadkin/Keller/Westwood/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Eugenia Gallo / Betsy Harris vs Virginia Pleasants / Laura Harvey6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Varsik / Callie Kaszycki vs Laura Gregory / Sarah Blackwell6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Jennifer Maguire vs Debbie Lord / Sarah Chandler7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 - Tuesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Hannah Giles
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.58
Sarah Eugenia Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.53
Laura Varsik
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Lauren Hylarides
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.46
Caroline Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.32
Rebecca Hartsough
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Betsy Harris
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Colleen Isaacson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Emily Mustin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Callie Kaszycki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Amy Braden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Gallagher + Meghan de Young4261% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Giles
38W–3L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.67
Sarah Eugenia Gallo
28W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
Laura Varsik
56W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Lauren Hylarides
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Gallagher
18W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Betsy Harris
38W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.22
3
Colleen Isaacson
29W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Emily Mustin
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Callie Kaszycki
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Braden
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jennifer Maguire
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.