Teams

Sunset Hot Shots

2026 USTA Mixed 55 & Over - Ventura · Ventura Mixed 55& Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · Ventura Mixed 55& Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunset Hot Shots000000
2North Ranch Screwballs000000
3Ojai Mixies000000
4I’d Hit That000000
5DAM Ball WACkers 55+000000
6Chicks and Sticks000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Earl Schwartz
published 3.5
3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.39
Janice Pinnell
published
3.38
SANDI WISE
published 3.5
3.35
Michael Mantai
published
3.34
Patty Starkey
published
3.30
Fred Cohen
published 3.5
3.29
Chuck Mathews
published 3.5
3.28
Fuat Doymaz
published 3.5
3.23
X Dennis Tang
published
3.11
Wendy Brown
published
2.98
Raymi Schwartz
published 3.5
Megan Mathews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Starkey + Michael Mantai5257% games+7.0% vs expected
Raymi Schwartz + Earl Schwartz134 matchesnot enough data
Chuck Mathews + Janice Pinnell213 matchesnot enough data
Raymi Schwartz + Michael Mantai123 matchesnot enough data
Ina Kim + Earl Schwartz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Earl Schwartz
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Michael Mantai
36W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Patty Starkey
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Fred Cohen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chuck Mathews
22W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Fuat Doymaz
17W–8L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
X Dennis Tang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Raymi Schwartz
111W–147L career · type A · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Megan Mathews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.