Teams

MVS Barnes WSL A40-4.0W

2026 WMI WSL Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI WSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-03vs PTC Hendrickson WSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Sarah Williams vs Meredith Mast / Molly McNamara6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Muth / Kristen Snyder vs Allison Klingenberg / Maggie Stewart7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEmi Mueller / Marnie Mauk vs Ally McCall / Shannon Smith6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-20vs HC Haan WSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Sarah Williams vs Jasmine Irish / Rachel Haan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Snyder / Sharon Barnes vs Kerri Stoel / Mindy Koschmann7-6, 3-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Shea / Stacy Ehrlich vs Kristie Carithers / Tracy Harrison6-1, 6-2
2026-05-13vs WH VanDenBerg WSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Julie Ludden vs Jessica Anderson / Michelle Molitor6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarnie Mauk / Teresa Nelson vs Lori Green / Mauri VanDenBerg1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKerry Clay / Meera Lee vs Ann Wright / Stephanie Lowes6-0, 6-0
2026-04-22vs MVH LaFramboise WSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Oosterhouse / Sarah Williams vs Amanda LaFramboise / Luann Mullen6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKerry Clay / Meera Lee vs Nicole Fender / Samantha Barkey6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Shea / Naoko Kobrak vs Michelle Daane / Lora Dykstra6-4, 6-3
2026-03-25vs MY Fogarty WSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesCourtney Muth / Natalie Pickup vs Lauren Worgess / Ronda Stafford6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Antor / Sharon Barnes vs Carmen Harris / Cary Sullivan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSabina Centner / Stacy Ehrlich vs Denise Lancaster / Diane Dirette6-3, 6-3
2026-03-11vs HC Jorritsma WSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Snyder / Teresa Nelson vs Beth Post / Linda Schnobel6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Muth / Sharon Barnes vs Donna Jorritsma / Kristine Mestrom6-7, 4-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Antor / Naoko Kobrak vs Emily Van Faasen / Ann Dawson6-4, 7-5
2026-02-25vs MVC Gardzinski WSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmi Mueller / Julie Ludden vs Joan Hannadarrell / Danuta Radzio6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Barnes / Emily Oosterhouse vs Erin Fouty / Brenda Stagg6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Ehrlich / Sabina Centner vs Kate Vincent / Rachel Ogilvie6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WMI WSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVS Barnes WSL A40-4.0W701837123
2MVC Gardzinski WSL A40-4.0W52111021180
3PTC Hendrickson WSL A40-4.0W4312920167
4MY Fogarty WSL A40-4.0W4312924182
5HC Haan WSL A40-4.0W43101125185
6WH VanDenBerg WSL A40-4.0W34101126197
7HC Jorritsma WSL A40-4.0W1681327199
8MVH LaFramboise WSL A40-4.0W0731836236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Natalie Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Emi Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Julie Ludden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Sharon Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Teresa Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Kerry Clay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Stacy Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Marie Shea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Courtney Muth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kristen Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Meera Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Elizabeth Antor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Sabina Centner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Emily Oosterhouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Naoko Kobrak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Marnie Mauk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Ehrlich + Sharon Barnes6079% games+14.1% vs expected
Natalie Pickup + Teresa Nelson6076% games+10.6% vs expected
Kristen Snyder + Teresa Nelson6257% games+10.2% vs expected
Emi Mueller + Julie Ludden10076% games+8.9% vs expected
Stacy Ehrlich + Meera Lee9268% games+8.3% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Teresa Nelson5263% games+7.1% vs expected
Natalie Pickup + Courtney Muth4169% games+6.8% vs expected
Kerry Clay + Meera Lee26562% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Natalie Pickup
133W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.05
Emi Mueller
82W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Julie Ludden
135W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Sharon Barnes
174W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Teresa Nelson
70W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.84
Kerry Clay
88W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Stacy Ehrlich
122W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Marie Shea
77W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Courtney Muth
33W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kristen Snyder
64W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.72
4
Meera Lee
111W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Elizabeth Antor
68W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Sabina Centner
33W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Emily Oosterhouse
42W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Naoko Kobrak
38W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
Marnie Mauk
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.