Teams

Warner

2021 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMitch Rogers / Andrew Sabolic vs Dan Bellamy / Brian Bellamy0-6, 1-6
2021-04-07vs MorrisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Warner / Travis Sykes vs Brian Bellamy / Arnold Cooperman6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrew Sabolic vs Nicolas Taureau3-6, 4-6
2021-03-31vs MorrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesTravis Sykes / Kenneth Seymore vs Andrew Morris / FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-24Won 20
W#2 DoublesTravis Sykes / Kevin Warner vs Dennis Kelley / Arnold Cooperman6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAndrew Sabolic vs Brian Bellamy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Sabolic / Kenneth Seymore vs Dan Bellamy / Brian Bellamy7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-03vs MorrisWon 20
W#1 DoublesKenneth Seymore / Andrew Sabolic vs Brian Bellamy / FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTravis Sykes / Charles Bunker vs Andrew Morris / James Cichon3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-02-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Warner / Travis Sykes vs James Cichon / FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Clark Kuntz
published 4
3.77
Travis Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Kenneth Seymore
published
Andrew Sabolic
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.49
Kevin Warner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Sykes + Clark Kuntz1447% gamesnot enough data
Clark Kuntz + Kenneth Seymore4153% gamesnot enough data
Travis Sykes + Kevin Warner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clark Kuntz
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Travis Sykes
80W–55L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Kenneth Seymore
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Andrew Sabolic
27W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Anthony Cammarata
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Warner
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.