Teams

CV-PGA West/Palmieri

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Easley / Marde Olson vs Jessica Inserra / Lindy Gaylord5-7, 6-7
2023-11-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoxane Carvajal / Jennifer Easley vs Elaine Reddick-Cooley / Kathy Haugh1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Easley / Jayne Raeburn vs Christina Cooley / Jessica Inserra3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lyssa Vermillion
published
Jennifer Easley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Margaret Middleton
published
2.60
Kathleen Novarro
published 3
2.60
Susan Waugh
published
2.49
Dawn Hubbard
published 3
2.29
PALMIERI PALMIERI
published
Jayne Raeburn
published
Kathie Miller
published
Kelley Johnson
published
Loran Arvizu
published
Marde Olson
published
Roxane Carvajal
published
Terri Langhans
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyssa Vermillion
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Jennifer Easley
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Middleton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kathleen Novarro
16W–29L career · type S · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Susan Waugh
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Dawn Hubbard
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
PALMIERI PALMIERI
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.29
Jayne Raeburn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathie Miller
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelley Johnson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Loran Arvizu
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marde Olson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxane Carvajal
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Langhans
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.