Teams

UPTA40S/Hill/GCC

2026 UPTA Singles 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Singles Women - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 18 9:00 AM
Riverwalk Tennis Courts
Sep 25 9:00 AM
vs
Thornblade Club
Oct 2 9:00 AM
Greenville Country Club
Oct 9 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Ali Hill
Oct 16 9:00 AM
The Pavilion
Oct 23 9:00 AM
Greenville Country Club
2026-09-11vs UPTA40S/Allen/PavilionLost 12
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Philmon vs Austin Clay3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBetsy Norwood vs Natilee Falk6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMary Frances Knapp vs Brie Soler6-4, 6-1
2026-09-03vs UPTA40S/Seeley/Thornblade/Won 30
W#1 SinglesKerry Ellett vs Jane Miller6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDrake Gribbin vs Erica Kelly6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAnna Cheves vs Angela Joffe6-4, 7-5
2026-08-28vs UPTA40S/Murillo/CardinalLost 12
L#1 SinglesDanette Kabas vs Mary Jo Clarkson2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBetsy Norwood vs Caroline Carter2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesShely Landrum vs Britanny A ROOD6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40+ Singles Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40S/Murillo/Cardinal000000
2UPTA40S/Knight/RiverWalk000000
3UPTA40S/Hill/GCC000000
4UPTA40S/Seeley/Thornblade/000000
5UPTA40S/Allen/Pavilion000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Andrea Phillips
published 3.5
3.40
Anna Cheves
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Drake Gribbin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Kerry Ellett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Tracy O'Shea
published
3.24
Elizabeth Philmon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Mary Frances Knapp
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Danette Kabas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Betsy Norwood
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Shely Landrum
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Shelly Walker
published
2.76
Nina Jackson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Phillips
15W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Anna Cheves
5W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Drake Gribbin
40W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kerry Ellett
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Tracy O'Shea
38W–27L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Philmon
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Mary Frances Knapp
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Danette Kabas
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Betsy Norwood
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Shely Landrum
25W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Shelly Walker
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Nina Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.