Teams

Galdieri/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-16vs Greer/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Cannon / Gwendolyn Mrva vs Autumn Peterson / Jennifer Stettler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Labonia vs Savannah Burton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiana Galdieri / Kelly Baker vs Whitney Greer / Mary Margaret Posey6-0, 6-0
2025-04-09vs Montague/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaige Swanquist / Kelly Baker vs Anne von Lanken / Martha Carter6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChelsea Jewell vs Rachel Montague6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Galdieri / Carolyn Labonia vs Hannah Hackett / Madeleine Bobango6-2, 6-1
2025-03-19vs Ogles/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesChelsea Jewell / Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin vs Amber McCabe / Tressa Ogles6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDiana Galdieri vs Laura Connerley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Baker / Paige Swanquist vs Emily D Folk / Sarah Conrad6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Chelsea Jewell
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 3.5
2.95
Carolyn Labonia
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.64
Paige Swanquist
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.56
Emily Craven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Gwendolyn Mrva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Diana Galdieri
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.21
Doriann Fairchild
published
2.14
Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Liza Easley
published
2.12
Jeanne Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.86
Candace Askew
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Cannon + Emily Craven224 matchesnot enough data
Liza Easley + Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chelsea Jewell
39W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Carolyn Labonia
27W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Paige Swanquist
12W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Emily Craven
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Gwendolyn Mrva
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.49
3
Diana Galdieri
19W–28L career · 9 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Doriann Fairchild
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Liza Easley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jeanne Cannon
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Candace Askew
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.