Teams

GEPTA/Harrison/Adult 18 &over/3.5M/WC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Enrique Darancou
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Enrique Mirazo
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Greg Daw
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Greg DiDonna
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Jared Nieman
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jay Inzer
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Luis Herran
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Marcus Kern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Micah Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Nico Tejeda
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Leslie
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Rene Diaz
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Richard Overley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sergio Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
TJ Karam
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Ted Stoltzman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Terry Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Zachary Daw
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Leslie + Enrique Mirazo2542% games+4.9% vs expected
Terry Calhoun + Greg Daw91349% games+2.9% vs expected
Paul Leslie + Micah Harrison17753% games+1.5% vs expected
Terry Calhoun + TJ Karam16556% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leslie + Jay Inzer11555% gamesnot enough data
Greg Daw + Zachary Daw10461% gamesnot enough data
TJ Karam + Jay Inzer10455% gamesnot enough data
Enrique Mirazo + TJ Karam4450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Enrique Darancou
28W–23L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Enrique Mirazo
79W–93L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Daw
65W–75L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg DiDonna
22W–30L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Nieman
17W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Inzer
39W–27L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Herran
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcus Kern
30W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Micah Harrison
49W–64L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nico Tejeda
18W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Leslie
85W–78L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rene Diaz
19W–16L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Overley
11W–43L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sergio Castaneda
61W–81L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Karam
74W–40L career · 43 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Stoltzman
9W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Calhoun
76W–68L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Daw
36W–19L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.