Teams

Penn - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-03vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Ingrid Corbett vs Bonnie Bucco / Liz Payne6-3, 6-4
2022-05-01vs Escambia - SHL/TanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Bonita Witkin vs Shannon Schluter / Kris Pritchard3-6, 6-7
2022-04-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Anna Kreis vs Anne Elidemir / Terry Dazet6-7, 5-7
2022-04-19vs Bryan - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Jacqueline Wallace vs Ginger Jeffcoat / Mary Bryan2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmanda Brown / Ingrid Corbett vs Elizabeth Newton / Jeannette Fabbro6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-14vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Mecy Wimberly vs Ginger Jeffcoat / Lisa Greskovich6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Sloan / Ingrid Corbett vs Denise Wilson / Mary Bryan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-12vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Bonita Witkin vs Susan Bonsignore / Suzanne Manziek6-4, 7-6
2022-03-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Bonita Witkin vs Elizabeth Newton / Ginger Jeffcoat4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-27vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Mecy Wimberly vs Sally Bergosh / Liz Payne6-2, 6-3
2022-03-15vs Escambia - SHL/TanWon 10
W#2 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Ingrid Corbett vs Cherie Krohn / Maureen Proctor3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alycia Esmonde
published 4
3.62
Bonita Witkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Kelly Dempsey
published
3.52
Amanda Brown
published 4
3.42
Karen Penn
published
3.33
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
3.29
Ingrid Corbett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Jacqueline Wallace
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tanya Hughes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonita Witkin + Mecy Wimberly2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alycia Esmonde
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bonita Witkin
55W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kelly Dempsey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Karen Penn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ingrid Corbett
67W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Jacqueline Wallace
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.