Teams

8-JPermutt-CHTC

2023 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-21vs 5-LFarber-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Maribeth Hamilton vs Jane Thrailkill / Sarah Ederle7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-14vs 4-KHoekstra-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaribeth Hamilton / Yvonne Acker vs Cindy Rossitch / Kateri Hoekstra3-6, 2-6
2023-09-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Maribeth Hamilton vs Jill Paul / Ann Weissler6-2, 6-2
2023-08-24vs 3-JHagerty-HVF 55Won 10
W#2 DoublesAraya Coffey / Regina Davis vs Nancy Sickel / Karen Heinemann4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs 2-DWebb-Eno 55Split 11
L#2 DoublesSara Summers / Araya Coffey vs Denise Heinze / Barbara Howe6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYvonne Acker / Marcey Setzer vs CARLA FIELDS / Pamela Hobson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-03vs 3-JHagerty-HVF 55Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Summers / Araya Coffey vs Katherine Chaney / Alice Stenstrom4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Joelle Permutt
published
Anahid Vrana
published 3.5
3.20
Sara Summers
published
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.11
Yvonne Acker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Mayell
published
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Maribeth Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marcey Setzer
published
Monica Kolzet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maribeth Hamilton + Araya Coffey2339% gamesnot enough data
Araya Coffey + Yvonne Acker404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joelle Permutt
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Anahid Vrana
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Summers
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Yvonne Acker
125W–166L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sharon Mayell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Maribeth Hamilton
43W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Marcey Setzer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Kolzet
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.