Teams

TOC.Hagopian-Edwards

2024 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-29vs LOCH.SigginsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Neal / Dana Frazier vs Kathy Rex / Jennifer Dulin6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Hagopian-Edwards / Stacey Stephens vs Elly Siggins / Susan Coulter2-6, 1-6
2024-04-23vs TOC.CardellaLost 02
L#2 DoublesDana Frazier / Perry LeGaux vs Patricia Twomey / Terry Friddle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Hagopian-Edwards / Lori Neal vs Jill Cardella / Amy Demsko4-6, 1-6
2024-04-16vs PW.PriestSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatalaba Napier / Dana Frazier vs Micha Federico / Lisa Slater3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJudith Hagopian-Edwards / Stacey Stephens vs Patti Hulbert / Janna Fisler6-4, 6-3
2024-04-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesDana Frazier / Mary Wilson vs Mary Sherman / Margaret Struble6-3, 6-1
2024-03-26vs TOC.BlancLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Frazier / Lori Neal vs Stephanie Jabusch / Michele Raymond Dolitka5-7, 1-6
2024-03-19vs CP.MunleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Wilson / Dana Frazier vs Claire Blackwelder / Anne Citrin6-3, 6-1
2024-03-12vs BENT.HiltSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDana Frazier / Sally Kennedy vs Sheri Lieffrig / Sonia Weber6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLori Neal / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Jacquelyn Raynor / Julie Quinn6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Stacey Stephens
published
2.91
Dana Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.68
Perry LeGaux
published
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.43
Lori Neal
published
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matalaba Napier + Judith Hagopian-Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Stephens
22W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Dana Frazier
126W–125L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Perry LeGaux
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%48%52%
2.51
Lori Neal
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.