Teams

BC LLW-AltaVista/GaiOdanaka8.0

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.95 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Men - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Larry Daniels
published
4.06
Ruedeemard Odanaka
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.96
Andrew Michell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Kangsung Yip
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Thomas Browne
published
3.81
Will A Ross
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Andy Frommenwiler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Duc Le
published 4
Brad Rutherford
published 4
3.72
Jon Peabody
published
3.72
Koichi Ishihara
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.70
Ken Senoo
published
3.69
Kyungwon Kang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Jeffery Kam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Pankaj Patel
published
Dean Seislove
published 3.5
Steven Kigawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koichi Ishihara + Andy Frommenwiler6946% gamesnot enough data
Koichi Ishihara + Kangsung Yip4546% gamesnot enough data
Koichi Ishihara + Kyungwon Kang5255% gamesnot enough data
Kyungwon Kang + Kangsung Yip4352% gamesnot enough data
Koichi Ishihara + Andrew Michell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Daniels
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Ruedeemard Odanaka
98W–95L career · 8 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
Andrew Michell
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Kangsung Yip
132W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Thomas Browne
37W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
Will A Ross
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Andy Frommenwiler
99W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Duc Le
22W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Brad Rutherford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jon Peabody
23W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Koichi Ishihara
66W–83L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Ken Senoo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Kyungwon Kang
80W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Jeffery Kam
148W–117L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
Pankaj Patel
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Dean Seislove
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Kigawa
76W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.