Teams

Sandusky/Roberts/JB/3Oaks

2026 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 20 2:00 PM
Jonesboro Country Club
Sep 28 6:00 PM
Allen Park Community Center
Oct 11 6:00 PM
Three Oaks Racquet Club
2026-09-09vs Cissell/JB/APCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElla Bradsher / Brandy Johnston vs Melanie Burnett / Jamie Chandler0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Box / June Long vs Julie Rogers / Jeanne Bailey3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Reba / Amy Gibson vs Misty Zaffarano / Molly Goodart6-4, 7-5
2026-08-24vs DiGaetano/JB/3OaksLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Box / Amy Gibson vs Jacqueline Gammill / Jocelyn Johnson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDanial Reed / June Long vs Shelly Little / Ellen Lawrence2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandy Johnston / Danae Sandusky vs Susa Digaetano / Himaja Balakrishnan4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiGaetano/JB/3Oaks000000
2Sandusky/Roberts/JB/3Oaks000000
3Parker/JB/JCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jenny Box
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Tracy Roberts
published
2.45
Danial Reed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Michele Reba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Danae Sandusky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.29
Caroline Wilson
published 2.5
2.28
Amy Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
June Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Brandy Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Box + Danae Sandusky1430% games−11.9% vs expected
Danae Sandusky + Tracy Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Box
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Tracy Roberts
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Danial Reed
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Michele Reba
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
3
Danae Sandusky
19W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
2.5
Caroline Wilson
16W–29L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Amy Gibson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
June Long
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Brandy Johnston
9W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.