Teams

Murdoch/Memphis

2026 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 40 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-22vs Glasgow/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Burk / Sarah Farris vs Mary Johnston Tayloe / Catie Carter0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Murdoch / Debbie Ziebart vs Lina Yi / Lesley Grubbs1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Cox / Susan Ogg vs Angie Deupree / Allison Harris2-6, 3-6
2026-08-15vs Glasgow/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Cox / Lu Schneider vs Ann Sneed / Lori Jones6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Burk / Susan Ogg vs Dana Bray / Catie Carter4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarley Myrick / Shannon Seay vs Zorana George / Elizabeth Kuhlo4-6, 1-6
2026-08-08vs Glasgow/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Ellen Mathews / Katharine Schuler vs Mary Johnston Tayloe / Lesley Grubbs3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarta Schmitt / Jenny Branston vs Abby Flowers / Caitlin Thomas7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarley Myrick / Sarah Farris vs Lina Yi / Isabel Xu4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Marta Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Mary Ellen Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Lisa Burk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Carley Myrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Ginger Murdoch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Lu Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Katharine Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Sarah Farris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Debbie Ziebart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Susan Ogg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Jenny Branston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Shannon Seay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Gwen Basinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Lori Fairless
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Branston + Katharine Schuler5160% games−9.7% vs expected
Shannon Seay + Susan Ogg314 matchesnot enough data
Katharine Schuler + Lu Schneider303 matchesnot enough data
Katharine Schuler + Susan Ogg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marta Schmitt
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Mary Ellen Mathews
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Lisa Burk
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Carley Myrick
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
Ginger Murdoch
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.92
Lu Schneider
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Katharine Schuler
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Sarah Farris
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Ziebart
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Ogg
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Jenny Branston
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Shannon Seay
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Gwen Basinger
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lori Fairless
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.