Teams

Sarcone

2024 Virginia Beach Tri-Level 18 & Over · Virginia Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-09-13vs SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Kathryn Kramer vs Tiffani Sherlock / Becky Gordon6-1, 6-0
2024-09-05vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Newton / Kathryn Fraim vs Heather Guillot / Erin James6-0, 6-3
2024-09-03vs Beth KulasWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Kathryn Kramer vs Liz Martin / Jennifer Kamarek6-3, 6-2
2024-08-30vs VIRGINIA BEACH - KezmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Newton / Kathryn Fraim vs Mariel McClung / Barbara Durso6-4, 6-2
2024-08-22vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Kramer / Kathryn Fraim vs Kelly Cody / Heather Guillot6-4, 6-3
2024-08-16vs Beth KulasLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Newton / Kathryn Fraim vs Liz Martin / Faye Downey6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2024-08-15vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Rebecca Newton vs Jackie Andrews / Jennifer Moore6-1, 6-3
2024-08-14vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Newton / Kathryn Fraim vs Jackie Andrews / Heather Guillot6-0, 6-1
2024-08-12vs Serve Me a DoubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Carrie Coleman vs Grace Doss / Merin Shekitka6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-06vs VIRGINIA BEACH - KezmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Rebecca Newton vs Shannon Dupre / Julie Soriano3-6, 3-6
2024-08-01vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Amy Lenthall / Merin Shekitka6-3, 6-1
2024-07-24vs Beth KulasWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Kathryn Kramer vs Jennifer Kamarek / Faye Downey6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tessa Robinson
published
3.56
Kelsey Sarcone
published
3.35
Kathryn Fraim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
published
3.29
Carrie Coleman
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Newton
published
2.98
Kelly Blessing
published
2.94
Kelly Bellis
published
2.93
Kathryn Kramer
published
2.93
Katie Chorazy
published
2.63
Polly Gellman
published
2.41
Dyan Witt
published
Margaret Shaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Coleman + Kathryn Fraim11655% games+3.0% vs expected
Kelly Bellis + Katie Chorazy3456% games+0.5% vs expected
Kelsey Sarcone + Rebecca Hoover6356% games−4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tessa Robinson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Kelsey Sarcone
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Kathryn Fraim
72W–55L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carrie Coleman
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Rebecca Newton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Kelly Blessing
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kelly Bellis
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathryn Kramer
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Katie Chorazy
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Polly Gellman
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Dyan Witt
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.41
Margaret Shaffer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.