Teams

Raintree Stahling 55 7.0

2025 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-18vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorrine Cooper / Catherine Fallin vs Susan Burns / Ann Falk6-0, 6-0
2025-08-11vs Westwood TowlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Catherine Fallin vs Katherine Towler / SanDee Gammon6-1, 6-1
2025-08-04vs Burkwood Moore FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Webb / Catherine Fallin vs Cynthia Muncy / Tricia Jones6-3, 6-2
2025-07-28vs Dominion Club Long 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Catherine Fallin vs Deborah Eldridge / Lori Davis6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Webb / Corrine Cooper vs Susan Long / Heather Long6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Hermitage HarcumLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Lisa Harmon vs Lynn Holly / Beth Stinson2-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs MTC 7.0 DowningWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Catherine Fallin vs Nancy Reynolds / Jeannie Langnau6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Webb / Corrine Cooper vs Marilyn Downing / Sandra Farrow6-3, 6-1
2025-06-23vs SCC LANESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Catherine Fallin vs Heather Holland / Kristin Kim6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Webb / Mona Stahling vs Annmarie Strachan / Melissa Brunner-Brown3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lisa Harmon
published
3.25
Catherine Fallin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Corrine Cooper
published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Penny
published
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
3.02
Donna Moody
published 3.5
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.86
Pam Koch
published
Kathryn Darling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Fallin + Lisa Harmon123 matchesnot enough data
Mona Stahling + Lisa Penny123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Harmon
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Catherine Fallin
125W–165L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Corrine Cooper
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Lisa Penny
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.86
Kathryn Darling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.