Teams

Dichiara

2025 18&Over Men Manhattan · 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-22vs RiversSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNick Mueller / Michael Owen vs Jack Petersen / Marc Sable7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNash Lovallo / Gerald Dichiara vs Robert Carter / Sam Sadeghi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Metro: Tomasini/DjordjevicLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulio Olaya / Michael Owen vs Samuel Todd / Payum Payman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNick Mueller vs Nikola Djordjevic3-6
L#2 DoublesGerald Dichiara / Nash Lovallo vs JORGE GODOY GOMIS / David Hannon2-6, 4-6
2025-06-22vs El-Haj AhmadLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Owen / Nash Lovallo vs Jonah Epstein / Jeffrey Wan4-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMatteo Crosignani vs Sean Ko1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnil Chakka / Michael Cornelius vs Mohammad El-Haj Ahmad / Kwame Griffith5-7, 2-6
2025-06-16Won 21
W#1 DoublesNash Lovallo / Michael Owen vs Bryant Born / Marc Sable6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Lippert vs Robert Carter7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulio Olaya / James Tang vs Andy Riggs / James Rivers6-2, 6-4
2025-06-10vs HaLost 02
L#1 DoublesNash Lovallo / Julio Olaya vs Benjamin Maffa / Kevin Ha1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEdwin Zhang / Gerald Dichiara vs Ted Berkowitz / Naveen Nath1-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs Metro: Tomasini/DjordjevicLost 02
L#1 DoublesNash Lovallo / Nick Mueller vs Samuel Todd / David Hannon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGerald Dichiara / Jonathan Lippert vs Ben Shapiro / James Freeman2-6, 3-6
2025-05-18vs El-Haj AhmadLost 12
W#1 DoublesNick Mueller / Nash Lovallo vs Daniel Wong / Jeffrey Wan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatteo Crosignani vs Sean Ko4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Laible / Wade Tucker vs James Russell / Michael Mintz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-05vs HaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Lippert / Aaron Pezzullo vs Kevin Ha / Benjamin Maffa5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNash Lovallo / James Tang vs Ted Berkowitz / Naveen Nath6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1El-Haj Ahmad0815717186
2Metro: Tomasini/Djordjevic0816720201
3Ha08141020195
4Dichiara0891432234
5Rivers0842043277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Julio Olaya
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Aaron Pezzullo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.61
Gerald Dichiara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.59
Michael Cornelius
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.55
Jonathan Lippert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.44
Justin Laible
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Wade Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Edwin Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anil Chakka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Tang
published
Matteo Crosignani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nash Lovallo
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Nick Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Lippert + Gerald Dichiara044 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Lippert + Aaron Pezzullo213 matchesnot enough data
Gerald Dichiara + Justin Laible033 matchesnot enough data
Wade Tucker + Justin Laible033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julio Olaya
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Aaron Pezzullo
2W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gerald Dichiara
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Michael Cornelius
78W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.59
Jonathan Lippert
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Justin Laible
19W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.44
Wade Tucker
65W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Edwin Zhang
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.03
Anil Chakka
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Tang
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matteo Crosignani
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nash Lovallo
3W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Mueller
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.