Teams

19 CCV Causing a Racket - Fishero

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Abigail Fishero
published 3.5
3.28
3.25
Mary Desch
published
3.19
Pearson French
published
3.10
Elizabeth Crowley
published
3.10
Berkeley Martin
published 3
3.02
Margaret Meyers
published
2.98
Peanut Kempe
published
2.96
Heather Miller
published
2.72
Kate Wall
published
2.66
2.56
Sarah Powers
published
2.36
Molly Childress
published
2.33
Maria Pahuja
published
Ginny Hofheimer
published
Kathleen Pearson
published
Marlene Crockett
published
Mary Cate Ferguson
published
Massie Cooper
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abigail Fishero
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Mary Catherine Washo
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Mary Desch
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Pearson French
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Elizabeth Crowley
21W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Berkeley Martin
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.10
Margaret Meyers
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Peanut Kempe
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
Heather Miller
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Kate Wall
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Caroline Wellford
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Sarah Powers
20W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%33%67%
2.56
Molly Childress
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
Maria Pahuja
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.33
Ginny Hofheimer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Pearson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marlene Crockett
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Cate Ferguson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Massie Cooper
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.