Teams

PVIC - Egan

2024 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-14vs Club Continental - AldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Peter Gibson vs Len Pfuntner / Claudia Grosskruger2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-12vs Duval/Muehl/40&over8.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Gibson / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Cort Raithel / Katie Deering4-6, 3-6
2024-04-05vs Hidden Hills - XuLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoann Welborn / Peter Gibson vs Eileen Edsall / Matthew Bywaters4-6, 3-6
2024-03-30vs Deerwood - VavricaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Peter Gibson vs Hildy Neel / H Bryan Neel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-29vs Baymeadows - CruzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoann Welborn / Brad Bush vs Govind Budda / Khanna Gibson1-6, 3-6
2024-02-09vs Hidden Hills - XuLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Brad Bush vs Grace Costello / William Jahn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-19vs Duval/Herzfeld/40&Over8.0mxdLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrad Bush / Joann Welborn vs Scott Haines / Cynthia Haines2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Alexis Schuchart
published 4.5
4.10
Jill Saig
published
3.81
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Donna Bush
published
3.77
Heather LaPrade
published 4
3.77
Pamela Alpert
published
3.75
Jayne Coffing
published
3.53
Steven Alpert
published
3.51
Joann Welborn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Brad Bush
published 3.5
3.33
Sean Mann
published
3.31
Rob DeJesus
published
3.21
Ben Landis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Schuchart + Ben Landis314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Saig + Ben Landis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexis Schuchart
49W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.10
4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
Donna Bush
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Pamela Alpert
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Jayne Coffing
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Steven Alpert
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
Joann Welborn
50W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Brad Bush
4W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Sean Mann
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Rob DeJesus
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Ben Landis
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.