Teams

CRRC Wildcats

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-25vs Sawmill SmashersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Rosenberg / Gina Sassano vs Janine Lafond / Jessica Seidel6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Hollander / Mary Herrington vs Suzanne Millette / Samantha Cullen7-5, 2-4
L#3 DoublesLeah Aizen / Johanna Steinberg vs Dana Jensen / Grace Fung4-6, 4-6
2026-03-18vs Armonk Tennis: AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Friedberg / Dana Rosenberg vs Lindsay Brand / Diana Regini6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGina Sassano / Nayoung Lee vs Stephanie Lewis / Robyn Cameron5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Hollander / Mary Herrington vs Adela Kahn / Michele Krevolin2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-10vs WTC: 3.0 Center CourtWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Sassano / Karen Friedberg vs Anne Hentschel / Veronica Touzot2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessie Rubin / Nayoung Lee vs Nicoletta Okane / Stephanie Conners6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Hollander / Vaishali Bhattacharyya vs Stacey Wechsler / Stephanie Horton7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-04vs TIA WP: 3.0 PurpleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLucia Roberta / Courtney Rault vs Melissa Eisenberg / Simone McGregor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Sassano / Dana Rosenberg vs Sara Parganos / Jacqueline Reisner3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLeah Aizen / Mary Herrington vs HEATHER COLON / Renee Goldman2-6, 5-7
2026-02-11vs Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare DoubleWon 21
L#1 DoublesDinah Baken / Lucia Roberta vs Tani Gelber / Jodi Venuti7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRegina Allegretti-Davenport / Dana Rosenberg vs Beth Zolkind / Jamie Jacobs7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeah Aizen / Kristen Hulme vs Erica Kolbrener / La'Shawn Sterling6-3, 6-3
2026-02-02vs TCH: Love AllWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucia Roberta / Courtney Rault vs Natasha Corio / Sanghee O'Reilly6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRegina Allegretti-Davenport / Dinah Baken vs Lisa Wade / Stacey Gershkovich2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Greene / Nayoung Lee vs Melinda Chiavaro / Nicole Lee6-2, 6-3
2026-01-28vs WTC: 3.0 Grand SlamsWon 20
W#2 DoublesDana Rosenberg / Jessie Rubin vs Nicole Dashiell / Erika DIMSON6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlisa Dror / Amy Hollander vs Kelly Grant / Eleanore Kim7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-21vs Armonk Domes: Serves You RightLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Friedberg / Regina Allegretti-Davenport vs Lindsay Finkler / Leah Alani6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Sassano / Jane Greene vs Julie Karish / Allison Baumrind3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVaishali Bhattacharyya / Mary Herrington vs Stephanie Lederman / Genevieve Hirsch4-6, 6-6
2026-01-14vs Life Time EmeraldWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Rault / Dinah Baken vs Kimberlee Yamamoto / Tulika Khemani6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRegina Allegretti-Davenport / Vaishali Bhattacharyya vs Abigail Khan / Lynn Pollack6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessie Rubin / Gina Sassano vs Patti Feldman / Jennifer Bancroft6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Jessie Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Courtney Rault
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Dana Rosenberg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.85
Lucia Roberta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Jane Greene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Dinah Baken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Regina Allegretti-Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Maura Walsh
published
2.67
Amy Hollander
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Gina Sassano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Mary Herrington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Leah Aizen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Johanna Steinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Vaishali Bhattacharyya
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Nayoung Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Alisa Dror
published 3
Kristen Hulme
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vaishali Bhattacharyya + Nayoung Lee5357% games+13.9% vs expected
Jane Greene + Johanna Steinberg13953% games−3.8% vs expected
Gina Sassano + Jessie Rubin5165% gamesnot enough data
Jane Greene + Maura Walsh224 matchesnot enough data
Regina Allegretti-Davenport + Lucia Roberta314 matchesnot enough data
Nayoung Lee + Alisa Dror134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Greene + Regina Allegretti-Davenport033 matchesnot enough data
Regina Allegretti-Davenport + Maura Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jessie Rubin
25W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Courtney Rault
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Dana Rosenberg
48W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Lucia Roberta
79W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jane Greene
27W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dinah Baken
6W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Regina Allegretti-Davenport
71W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Maura Walsh
67W–41L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Amy Hollander
23W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Gina Sassano
58W–51L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Mary Herrington
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Leah Aizen
117W–277L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.65
Johanna Steinberg
30W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
Vaishali Bhattacharyya
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Nayoung Lee
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Alisa Dror
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Kristen Hulme
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.