Teams

Hicks-GCC

2023 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-09vs McDowell- ICCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Clyde King / Lucy Swayze vs Molly Judson / Cary Walker6-0, 6-1
2023-05-02vs Brown-CCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucy Swayze / Hilary Barrett vs Taylor Newton / Mallory Burchfield7-5, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMerritt Reichle vs Carley Brown5-3
L#2 DoublesMary Clyde King / Elizabeth Barnes vs Taylor Hackney / Allison Watkins2-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs Perkins-GGCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSwayze Hicks / Rachel Goldberg vs Angela Phillips / Angela Davis6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMerritt Reichle vs Allison Montague6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Hilary Barrett vs Vanessa Perkins / Katherine Shamoon0-6, 0-6
2023-04-11vs Ward-CCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Williams / Mary Clyde King vs Taylor Ward / Destiny Livingston2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMerritt Reichle vs Christie Sledge3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Swayze Hicks vs Molly Roberts / Brianna Keeton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-04vs Brocato-DCTRCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSwayze Hicks / Rachel Goldberg vs Whitney Jones / Allison Brady6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Clyde King / Elizabeth Barnes vs Alicia Bariola / Haley Hamrick2-6, 1-6
2023-03-22vs Wooley- DCTRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucy Swayze / Beth Williams vs Heike Wooley / Karen Fleming6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMerritt Reichle vs Olivia Johnson6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSwayze Hicks / Hilary Barrett vs Leah Ellis / Mary Margaret Jones6-2, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ward-CCC5114411114
2Brocato-DCTRC511351195
3Brown-CCC429919146
4Wooley- DCTRC339920154
5Perkins-GGCC2481022153
6Hicks-GCC2471124161
7McDowell- ICC0631532205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Merritt Reichle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.25
Lucy Swayze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Swayze Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Hilary Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Clyde King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Swayze Hicks + Lucy Swayze0536% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merritt Reichle
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Lucy Swayze
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Swayze Hicks
7W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Hilary Barrett
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Clyde King
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.