Teams

Black-Tatum-18s

2025 Adult 18&Over-PB · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-06vs StewartWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie C Fink / Carly Wise vs Cindy Cochran / Kaylee McLaurin6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAllison Mayers vs Allison Radley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Black / Melinda Robinson vs Maya Stewart / Kim Tatum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-04vs ST LOUIS/TatumWon 50
W#1 DoublesSusan Shemper / Laura Owen vs Brandi Harper / Robin Hudson6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLogan Smithers vs Beth Rodgers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarly Wise / Melanie C Fink vs Tina Boykin / Tammy Kolbo6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAllison Mayers vs Ali Bounds6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Gianola / Melinda Robinson vs Ashley Majors / Tracy Speights4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-17vs StewartWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarly Wise / Melinda Robinson vs Maya Stewart / Kim Tatum6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Mayers vs Allison Radley6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSaia Stetelman / Kimberly Fortenberry vs Kaylee McLaurin / Cindy Cochran2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Ashley Davidson6-2, 6-4
2025-04-13vs ST LOUIS/TatumWon 32
W#1 DoublesAllison Mayers / Carly Wise vs Karol St Louis / Bethany Bounds6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLogan Smithers vs Wendi Johnson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Fortenberry / Saia Stetelman vs Ashley Majors / Tracy Speights4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Beth Rodgers5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Black / Elizabeth Asmar vs Tina Boykin / Regan Rhian Parker7-5, 6-4
2025-03-02vs ST LOUIS/TatumWon 50
W#1 DoublesLaura Owen / Susan Shemper vs Karol St Louis / Heather Flathau6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKeri Galey vs Beth Rodgers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSaia Stetelman / Carrie Olsson vs Tina Boykin / Regan Rhian Parker6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLogan Smithers vs Wendi Johnson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Gianola / Carly Wise vs Ashley Majors / Tracy Speights6-0, 6-4
2025-02-16vs StewartWon 41
W#1 DoublesDanielle Black / Carly Wise vs Maya Stewart / Karen Wilkins6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKeri Galey vs Bayley Askin0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Goodin / Elizabeth Asmar vs Cindy Cochran / Kaylee McLaurin0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAllison Mayers vs Renee Dozier6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie C Fink / Laura Owen vs Lisa Doleac / Ashley Davidson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Carly Wise
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Allison Mayers
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.63
Carrie Olsson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Courtney Gianola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Susan Shemper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Melanie C Fink
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Keri Galey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Danielle Black
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Saia Stetelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Logan Smithers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Melinda Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Mary Jo Goodin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Fortenberry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Robinson + Courtney Gianola4155% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Asmar + Danielle Black224 matchesnot enough data
Allison Mayers + Courtney Gianola314 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Olsson + Elizabeth Asmar213 matchesnot enough data
Carly Wise + Melanie C Fink303 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Black + Mary Jo Goodin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Wise
23W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Allison Mayers
40W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Olsson
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Courtney Gianola
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Susan Shemper
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Melanie C Fink
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Keri Galey
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Danielle Black
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Saia Stetelman
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Elizabeth Asmar
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Logan Smithers
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Melinda Robinson
26W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Mary Jo Goodin
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Kimberly Fortenberry
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.