Teams

High Strung

2026 Fall Flex Singles · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-19vs Kim 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristina Sipe vs Mi Ae Kim6-2, 6-2
2025-11-11vs Singing singlesLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristina Sipe vs Amy Fuller6-7, 1-6
2025-10-16vs NguyenLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristina Sipe vs HA NGUYEN3-6, 2-6
2025-10-07vs Rachel ClaflinLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristina Sipe vs Rachel Claflin2-6, 6-6
2025-09-27vs ClareWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristina Sipe vs Clare Cadiz6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Christina Sipe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Sipe
85W–79L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.