Teams

Brod/Montali

2024 Tri-Level Metro · 3.5

24 players · average NTRP 4.06 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-12-04vs GouldWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Reiche / Parul Sangwan vs Angelica Mattschei / Wendy Iraheta6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Sokol / Lizaveta Markouskaya vs Lisa Frantz / Karen Blakely6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTanya Kotov / Lavinia Barrientos vs Gail Shube / Elizabeth Gormley6-1, 6-1
2024-11-17vs Bindler/LamWon 21
W#1 DoublesRegi Monroe / Sara Lazarevic vs Caitlyn Frankel / Nicole Kwok6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEsther Hong / Pooja Mukund vs Meiko Boynton / Yvette Gong5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Kotov / Katherine Martin vs Claire Chang / Melody Peng7-5, 6-3
2024-11-14vs ImperialSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCourtney Sokol / Parul Sangwan vs Paddi Hurley / Anita Venkiteswaran6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnnette Welles / Theresa Fisher vs Crystal Qin / Ling Zhang4-6, 2-6
2024-11-06vs Eichenbaum/TegtmeyerWon 30
W#1 DoublesRegi Monroe / Laura Hope vs Jennifer Lee / Stephanie Durand6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Reiche / Jennifer Rudd vs Lauren Wittels / Karen Hyams6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLavinia Barrientos / Tanya Kotov vs Zsuzsa Price / Christine Pon7-5, 6-1
2024-10-30vs Metro: ZhouLost 01
L#2 DoublesParul Sangwan / Courtney Sokol vs Clara Ceccaldi / Yoeur-Man Teagan MacH2-6, 3-6
2024-10-23vs GouldLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Hope / Sara Lazarevic vs Lola Fadulu / Lane Merlo6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Reiche / Lily Davis vs Skyler Simson / Lisa Frantz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLIAH KIM / Lavinia Barrientos vs Grace Appel / Pam Widener6-0, 0-6, 0-1
2024-10-17vs Bindler/LamWon 21
L#1 DoublesRachel Weiss / Francine Pickup vs Emily Rizer / Nicole Kwok6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLizaveta Markouskaya / Elizabeth Heintzleman vs Stephany Bonney / Jennifer Hurford6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnette Welles / Theresa Fisher vs Melody Peng / Claire Chang6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-10vs ImperialWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Weiss / Sara Lazarevic vs Paddi Hurley / Hiroko Hayashi6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLizaveta Markouskaya / Rachel Petry vs Anita Venkiteswaran / Gabrielle Billington6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Fisher / Melissa Brod vs Elisa Fm / Annicris Garcia6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-26vs Eichenbaum/TegtmeyerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCourtney Sokol / Rachel Weiss vs Carly Huskisson / Joy Tegtmeyer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLizaveta Markouskaya / Elizabeth Heintzleman vs Bonnie Aves / Annette Delgado6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnnette Welles / Theresa Fisher vs Lisa Bernstein / Leigh Flayton6-1, 6-2
2024-09-18vs Metro: ZhouLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Lazarevic / Rachel Weiss vs Amy Untch / Lena Arafa7-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Sokol / Parul Sangwan vs Clara Ceccaldi / Yoeur-Man Teagan MacH2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Brod / Lavinia Barrientos vs Kate Kelly / Marija Vareikaite0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Regi Monroe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.26
Lizaveta Markouskaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Charlotte Reiche
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Courtney Sokol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.83
Parul Sangwan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Pooja Mukund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Tanya Kotov
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Lily Davis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Lavinia Barrientos
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.67
Jennifer Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Annette Welles
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Esther Hong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Dunja Froman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Rachel Petry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Andrea Montali
published 4
3.27
Theresa Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Melissa Brod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Katherine Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Heintzleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Francine Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LIAH KIM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Hope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Weiss
published
Sara Lazarevic
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Parul Sangwan + Courtney Sokol161755% games+18.2% vs expected
Tanya Kotov + Lavinia Barrientos11263% games+9.6% vs expected
Annette Welles + Theresa Fisher24860% games+8.7% vs expected
Tanya Kotov + Dunja Froman3259% games+5.2% vs expected
Esther Hong + Melissa Brod41142% games−3.8% vs expected
Jennifer Rudd + Lizaveta Markouskaya5256% games−4.5% vs expected
Lizaveta Markouskaya + Courtney Sokol134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Petry + Melissa Brod213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regi Monroe
69W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Lizaveta Markouskaya
76W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Charlotte Reiche
63W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Courtney Sokol
70W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Parul Sangwan
57W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Pooja Mukund
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Tanya Kotov
196W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Lily Davis
26W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Lavinia Barrientos
80W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.75
Jennifer Rudd
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Annette Welles
132W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.67
4
Esther Hong
89W–92L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dunja Froman
128W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Rachel Petry
26W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Andrea Montali
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Theresa Fisher
39W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Melissa Brod
34W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Katherine Martin
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Elizabeth Heintzleman
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Francine Pickup
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
LIAH KIM
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Laura Hope
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Weiss
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Lazarevic
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.