Teams

W18-2.5-Torrimar- Anita García

Adult 18 & Over 2021 · 2021 18 & Over Women 2.5-Flight 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Valerie MacIas vs CAMILLE ROIG / Andrea Zaragoza6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGabriella Paglieri / Margaryta Kret vs Zuleyka Medina / Janellisse Casiano Ruiz6-1, 6-3
2021-08-21vs W18-2.5-Baldrich -Hector BaezWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Valerie MacIas vs Ana Mercado / Paola Solis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabriella Paglieri / Caroll Rosario vs Lourdes Gonzalez / Danishia Santiago Figueroa6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGabriella Paglieri / Margaryta Kret vs STEPHANIE SANTIAGO / Clarissa Velazquez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-08-06vs W18-2.5-Baldrich -Hector BaezWon 20
W#1 DoublesValerie MacIas / Brenda Castro Diaz vs Danishia Santiago Figueroa / Viviana Fernandez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaroll Rosario / Coral Rivera vs Ileim Colon / Nicole Rodriguez6-3, 7-5
2021-08-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesCoral Rivera / Caroll Rosario vs Janellisse Casiano Ruiz / Jazmarie Rivera-Rodriguez6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesGabriella Paglieri / Kristina Hoffman vs STEPHANIE SANTIAGO / Ivette Maldonado6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMargaryta Kret vs Rina Gonzalez2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Valerie MacIas vs Carol Badillo / DAPHNE FRANCO6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2021 18 & Over Women 2.5-Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Coral Rivera
published 3.5
3.08
Gabriella Paglieri
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Brenda Castro Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Margaryta Kret
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.69
Caroll Rosario
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Ana Garcia
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Castro Diaz + Gabriella Paglieri8266% games+11.0% vs expected
Margaryta Kret + Gabriella Paglieri224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Coral Rivera
12W–18L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Gabriella Paglieri
63W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Brenda Castro Diaz
61W–60L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Margaryta Kret
22W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Caroll Rosario
35W–45L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Ana Garcia
46W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2021
0%53%47%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.