Teams

CMiller (Charlotte CC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTara Cawthorne / Catherine Miller vs Laura Pratt / Christina Prejean2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Oakford / Catherine Ruth Kelly vs Sun Moon / Felicia Ahn6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Lindsay Mathews vs Melissa Eccleston / Reshma Vora1-6, 4-6
2026-08-28vs VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Miller / Simpson Schmitt vs Debra Schwede / Karin Flemming6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay Mathews / Elizabeth Jack vs CHRISTI DEWAELE / Natalie Costello6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Thigpen / Page Gatewood vs Kathryn Collins / Traci Prieto1-6, 0-6
2026-08-21vs SNewman (BCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSimpson Schmitt / Brooke Adams vs Tiffani Wagner / Tracy Reitz6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLanny Gillespie / Elizabeth Jack vs Gaye Holmes / Jigisha Thaker6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Catherine Ruth Kelly vs Dori Cazorla / Melodie Ohaus4-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs LDyer (Mountainbrook)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTara Cawthorne / Emily Oakford vs Suzanne Purdy / Meghan Walker7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPage Gatewood / Erin Stubbs vs Elizabeth McGregor / Katie White1-6, 4-6
2026-08-11vs MMcHugh (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Russ / Catherine Miller vs Caroline Trammell / Jennifer Teller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Adams / Lanny Gillespie vs Tara Marcel / Emily White3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Ruth Kelly / Erin Stubbs vs Dayna Sheehan / Elizabeth Miars0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Tara Cawthorne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Brooke Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Emily Oakford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Elizabeth Jack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lindsay Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Lanny Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Page Gatewood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Catherine Ruth Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Taylor Russ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Emily Tindel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Erin Stubbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Kathryn Thigpen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Simpson Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Ruth Kelly + Emily Tindel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Cawthorne
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Brooke Adams
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Emily Oakford
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Elizabeth Jack
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Lindsay Mathews
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Lanny Gillespie
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Page Gatewood
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Catherine Ruth Kelly
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Taylor Russ
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Emily Tindel
32W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Erin Stubbs
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Kathryn Thigpen
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.56
Simpson Schmitt
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.