Teams

6.0 1

2024 Ekolu League · 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-20vs KalakoaWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesMac Rivera / Sarah de Silva vs Sandra McAuliffe / Paul Brotzman6-2, 6-3
2024-10-13Won 10
W#1 Male DoublesMac Rivera / Marc Miranda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-09vs 6.0 2Won 10
W#1 Male DoublesMarc Miranda / Mac Rivera vs Dean Takebayashi / Jordan Simeon7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-02vs 6.0 3Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesSarah de Silva / Chelsea Loeffler vs Kara Gota / Merceda Rivera6-0, 6-1
2024-09-08vs KalakoaLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSarah de Silva / Chelsea Loeffler vs Darnella Villanueva / Rebecca Marshall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-07vs Abunai CookiesWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesTy de Silva / Sarah de Silva vs Kip Nagata / Kerri Okamura6-3, 6-3
2024-09-01vs Abunai CookiesSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesIrene Yamanaka / Sarah de Silva vs Gwen Tanaka / Kira Mae6-2, 7-6
L#1 Male DoublesMarc Miranda / Mac Rivera vs Jonathan Aronce / Kip Nagata3-6, 4-6
2024-08-31vs Abunai BentosSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesChelsea Loeffler / Sarah de Silva vs Niko Gagne / Terri Inouye4-6, 4-6
W#1 Male DoublesMarc Miranda / Mac Rivera vs Ernest Texeira / Caedan Cambra6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
16.0 39121923219
26.0 173181228237
3Abunai Cookies64171331253
4Kalakoa37131738289
5Abunai Bentos37121838273
66.0 22882245297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Mac Rivera
usually #1 Male Doubles 83%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.45
Ty de Silva
published
3.23
Kimiona Watkins
published 3.5
3.20
Chrissy Capati
published 3.5
2.78
Jeremy Butterfield
published
2.77
Sarah de Silva
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Irene Yamanaka
published
Chelsea Loeffler
published 3
Garth Yamanaka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimiona Watkins + Mac Rivera0531% gamesnot enough data
Irene Yamanaka + Chrissy Capati303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mac Rivera
90W–82L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Ty de Silva
32W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kimiona Watkins
179W–109L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chrissy Capati
40W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Jeremy Butterfield
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Sarah de Silva
36W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Irene Yamanaka
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Chelsea Loeffler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Garth Yamanaka
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.