Teams

CCV - Pahuja

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-20vs Hermitage StuckeyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Gilchrist / Kathleen Pearson vs Meghan Hale / Corrine Garner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Pratt vs Kathryn Horsley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-13vs Mancini BellinisWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Gilchrist / Lauren Grammer vs Amanda Stamper / Kendall Maximini6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJodi Rives vs Jaclyn Tracey6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Pahuja / Caroline Wellford vs Deborah Mancini / Elizabeth Khatri6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs Magnolia Green - McKenneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesEricka Zeballos / Kathleen Pearson vs Erika Pound / Karin Wallace6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Grammer vs Katherine Jimenez6-2, 6-1
2025-05-23vs TDC Cervin/WoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaroline Wellford / Molly Childress vs Faith Cervin / Ashleigh Witt4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJodi Rives vs Linda Worthington6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Pahuja / Taylor Keeney vs Susan Partin / Liz Kiniry4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Mancini BellinisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarlene Crockett / Ericka Zeballos vs Meg Phillips / Kadie Weaver6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Pratt vs Julie Sprinkle6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Childress / Pamela Merrick vs Audra Kiewiet de Jonge / Cassie Berg6-3, 6-2
2025-05-12vs Hermitage StuckeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Wellford / Lauren Grammer vs Mary Robbins / Amanda Core6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJodi Rives vs Meghan Hale1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarlene Crockett / Pamela Merrick vs Erin Lovern / Beth Stuckey6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ericka Zeballos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Emily Gilchrist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Lauren Grammer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Amanda Pratt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Caroline Wellford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Marlene Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Molly Childress
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Maria Pahuja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Jodi Rives
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kathleen Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meghan Morris
published
Pamela Merrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peyton Edwards
published
Taylor Keeney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Grammer + Emily Gilchrist123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ericka Zeballos
39W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Emily Gilchrist
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Lauren Grammer
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Amanda Pratt
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Caroline Wellford
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Marlene Crockett
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Molly Childress
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
Maria Pahuja
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Jodi Rives
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Kathleen Pearson
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Morris
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Merrick
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peyton Edwards
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Keeney
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.