Teams

JOHNSON RANCH CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-23vs GOLD RIVER RC CM8.5BLost 12
W#1 DoublesBret Cochran / Anthony Salazar vs Pranesh Thirukkonda / Alexander Charn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEric White / Adam Andresen vs Roland Reese / Aaron Prince4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Mendoza / Josh Sarpotdar vs Todd Humphrey / Nazary Yatsenyak6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Anthony Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Jet Archuleta
published
4.15
Matthew Zimmerling
published
3.99
Bret Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Brian van Loon
published 4.5
3.85
Steve Osborn
published
3.82
David Self
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Patrick Dorais
published
Carson Dorais
published 4
3.73
Josh Sarpotdar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
John Pruett
published
3.67
Robert DeSousa
published
3.67
Adam Andresen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Matt Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Sarpotdar + Steve Osborn4452% games+5.5% vs expected
Brian van Loon + Robert DeSousa123 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Dorais + Steve Osborn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Salazar
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.39
Jet Archuleta
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
Matthew Zimmerling
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Bret Cochran
3W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Brian van Loon
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Steve Osborn
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
David Self
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Patrick Dorais
28W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Carson Dorais
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Sarpotdar
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
John Pruett
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.70
Robert DeSousa
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Adam Andresen
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Matt Kim
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.