Teams

GR-Dawson 18s 3.0W S

2025 Neuse River Singles 18 & over · 3.0 Women 18 & over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-09vs GCC-Greene 18s 3.0W SLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristi Geer vs Juanita Yarrell4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMary Hardison vs Mary-Marshall Greene4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTaylor Snodgrass vs Courtney Steed5-7, 6-7
2025-02-27vs GCC-Greene 18s 3.0W SLost 12
L#1 SinglesTaylor Snodgrass vs Martha Whitesides1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Beissner vs Juanita Yarrell6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMegan Pender vs Keela Blango1-6, 3-6
2025-02-24vs GCC-Greene 18s 3.0W SWon 21
W#1 SinglesMary Hardison vs Martha Whitesides7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLakisha Dawson vs Keela Blango6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCrystal Dawson vs Hanan Elgendy0-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs GCC-Greene 18s 3.0W SLost 12
W#1 SinglesJessica Beissner vs Carly Feingold3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMary Hardison vs Mary-Marshall Greene2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMegan Pender vs Keela Blango6-7, 0-6
2025-02-02vs GCC-Greene 18s 3.0W SLost 12
L#1 SinglesLakisha Dawson vs Martha Whitesides1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKristi Geer vs Courtney Steed6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKelli Dawson vs Shimika Rasha5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Jessica Beissner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.93
Lakisha Dawson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Mary Hardison
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Kristi Geer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Kelli Dawson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.53
Taylor Snodgrass
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.43
Megan Pender
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.25
Crystal Dawson
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Dawson + Megan Pender5449% games+6.5% vs expected
Lakisha Dawson + Megan Pender303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Beissner
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lakisha Dawson
52W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Mary Hardison
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kristi Geer
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Kelli Dawson
24W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Taylor Snodgrass
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Megan Pender
29W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Crystal Dawson
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.