Teams

Magnolia Green Winters 6.0

2025 Richmond Doubles Weeknight Women · Richmond Doubles Weeknight 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-02vs Three Chopt PriddyWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Winters / Amanda Biringer vs Pamela Hughes / Amanda Stoneburner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSunanda Desai / Dana Chenevert vs Carolyn Elgin / Nancy Priddy7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSky Lee / Keri Biggins vs Adalia De Leon / Lauren Williams6-3, 7-6
2025-05-22vs MAC Merry Makers Bates 6.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Sunanda Desai vs Heather Scott / Chitra Chavan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRachel Sheldon / Keri Biggins vs Anne Wolff / Melinda Staples7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-19vs Stonehenge Danowski 6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Amanda Biringer vs Aimie Gindi / Martha Pratt6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSky Lee / Molly Palenski vs Andrea Doyle / Elizabeth Danowski6-1, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarisa Taylor / Dana Chenevert vs Lexie Zambito / Stephanie Bridges6-1, 6-4
2025-04-21vs MAC Gault 6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Sunanda Desai vs Timea Harisova / Kayci McLeod6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNatalie Winters / Molly Palenski vs Karin Meissner / CONSTANCE MATTOX2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Sheldon / Sky Lee vs Maria Gault / Noelle Crews6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Doubles Weeknight 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Sunanda Desai
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Amanda Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Amanda Biringer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Sky Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Dana Chenevert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.51
Rachel Sheldon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keri Biggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marisa Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Palenski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Winters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Sheldon + Keri Biggins134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Biringer + Amanda Phillips224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Phillips + Sunanda Desai404 matchesnot enough data
Dana Chenevert + Sunanda Desai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunanda Desai
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Amanda Phillips
25W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Amanda Biringer
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sky Lee
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
2.5
Dana Chenevert
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%14%86%
2.65
Rachel Sheldon
21W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Keri Biggins
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisa Taylor
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Palenski
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Winters
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.