Teams

1.LOCH.Holsopple

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKenneth Waters / Ron Jeffery vs Nagaraju Jonnalagadda / Pierre Rebeyrat2-6, 2-6
2022-04-10vs 4.TOC.HarrisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSajjesh George / Ron Jeffery vs Daryn Watson / Jai Pandit6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesArthur Gloer vs Brandon Chanco5-7, 1-6
2022-04-04vs 2.PW.KinchenLost 01
L#3 DoublesRon Jeffery / Jay Schmitt vs Blake Hall / Ariel Edery5-7, 4-6
2022-03-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesArthur Gloer vs Daniel Moore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-20vs 7.TOC.KalluruSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRussell Lewis / Ron Jeffery vs Mahesh Salian / Kiran Ramaswamy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesArthur Gloer vs Sid Thakur0-6, 1-6
2022-03-06vs 6.TOC.JadiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRon Jeffery / Mark Baldwin vs Ankur Shah / Rishi Tandon6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Mark Baldwin
published
3.62
Frank Bordonaro
published 3.5
3.59
Russell Lewis
published
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
published
3.21
Ron Jeffery
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Trevor Hoyles
published
3.08
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
3.07
Vipul Patel
published
2.93
Arthur Gloer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Kenneth Waters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Waters + Arthur Gloer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Frank Bordonaro
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
Russell Lewis
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ron Jeffery
37W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Trevor Hoyles
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Vipul Patel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Arthur Gloer
39W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
Kenneth Waters
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.