Teams

Ratliff - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-17vs Jasionowski - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Ratliff / Valeriia Nazarova vs Chelsey Swann / Rebecca Wasdin1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Kirby vs Abigail Rick3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Gibson / Elizabeth Anderson vs Ann Marie Jasionowski / Lisa Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs DellaFera - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Ratliff / Melissa Gibson vs Jessic Melton / Stephanie Hepler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesValeriia Nazarova vs Connie Berdan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Reis / Carson Turner vs Mary Benson / Michelle Loy6-7, 1-6
2025-06-03vs Holmes - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Allison Rutherford vs Kelli Filardi / Wendy McIntosh Holmes2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesVenus Prince vs Natalie Nguyen6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Ratliff / Valeriia Nazarova vs Susan Schellin / Jessica Isakson6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-27vs Jasionowski - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesVenus Prince / Carson Turner vs Lisa Smith / Ann Marie Jasionowski0-1, 0-0
L#1 SinglesSara Ratliff vs Sadie Henry2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesValeriia Nazarova / Rachel Reis vs Rebecca Wasdin / Brianna Ross3-6, 3-6
2025-05-13vs Holmes - RS HardLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Kirby / Venus Prince vs Margaret Menear / ERIKA PHAN-LUNG4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Rachel Reis vs Susan Schellin / Tanya Young4-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs DellaFera - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gibson / Sara Ratliff vs Mary Benson / Dakota DellaFera2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesValeriia Nazarova vs Janet Brennen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Carson Turner vs Jessic Melton / Stephanie Hepler3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Rutherford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Melissa Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Rachel Reis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Sara Ratliff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.14
Holly Kirby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.04
Carson Turner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Valeriia Nazarova
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Venus Prince
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Rutherford
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Gibson
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Rachel Reis
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Sara Ratliff
5W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Holly Kirby
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Carson Turner
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Valeriia Nazarova
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Venus Prince
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.